These 6 Studies Show Why Children Should Never Be Injected With the CV 19 Shot

These 6 Studies Show Why Children Should Never Be Injected With the CV 19 Shot

These 6 Studies Show Why Children Should Never Be Injected With the CV 19 Shot

By Dr. Paul Elias Alexander

‘To consider subjecting healthy children to this risk to protect adults is perverse, reckless, and very dangerous.’ ‘Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche says mass vaccination turns children into shedders of more infectious variants.’

Children’s natural defenses against SARS-CoV-2 have spared them from the coronavirus, and therefore I ask why we would we seek to bypass these defenses and threaten them.   

Why vaccinate our children for this mild and typically non-consequential virus when they bring protective innate immunity towards COVID-19, other coronaviruses, and other respiratory viruses? Why push to vaccinate children who may well be immune due to prior exposure (asymptomatic or mild illness) and cross-reactivity/cross-protection? Children are likely COVID-recovered and as such are immune; why not consider assessing their immune status? Because of their young age, their robust innate immunity, and this possibility that they are COVID-recovered, they should not be given COVID vaccines.

Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche writes that children’s innate immunity “normally/naturally largely protects them and provides a kind of herd immunity in that it dilutes infectious CoV pressure at the level of the population, whereas mass vaccination turns them into shedders of more infectious variants. Children/youngsters who get the disease mostly develop mild to moderate disease and as a result continue to contribute to herd immunity by developing broad and long-lived immunity.”

This is potentially a very serious issue, for the vaccine offers children no opportunity for benefit and only potential for harms. We could end up killing thousands of our children with these safety untested vaccines. There is no proper safety data, either medium or long-term, and parents must stand up now and say NO! Under no condition for there is no evidence to support COVID vaccination of children. This op-ed provides 6 studies that helps make the case that children must be considered already “vaccinated” and must not be touched by these vaccines:

1.) A Yale University report (Yale and Albert Einstein College of Medicine report Sept. 18, 2020 in the journal Science Translational Medicine) indicates that children and adults display very diverse and different immune system responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection. This helps underscore why children have far less illness and mortality from COVID than adults do. The report states: “Since the earliest days of the COVID-19 outbreak, scientists have observed that children infected with the virus tend to fare much better than adults… [R]esearchers reported that levels of two immune system molecules — interleukin 17A (IL-17A), which helps mobilize immune system response during early infection, and interferon gamma (INF-g), which combats viral replication — were strongly linked to the age of the patients. The younger the patient, the higher the levels of IL-17A and INF-g, the analysis showed… [T]hese two molecules are part of the innate immune system, a more primitive, non-specific type of response activated early after infection.”

2) The virus uses the ACE 2 receptor to gain entry to the host cell, and the ACE 2 receptor has limited (less) expression and presence in the nasal epithelium in young children (potentially in upper respiratory airways); this partly explains why children are less likely to be infected in the first place, or spread it to other children or to adults, or even get severely ill; the biological molecular apparatus is simply not there in the nasopharynx of children as Patel and Bunyavanich reported. By bypassing this natural protection (limited nasal ACE 2 receptors in young children) and entering the shoulder deltoid, a COVID inoculation would release the vaccine, its mRNA and LNP content (e.g. PEG), and generated spike into a child’s circulation that could then damage the endothelial lining of the blood vessels (vasculature) and cause severe allergic reactions (e.g. here, here, here, here, here).

3) William Briggs reported on the n=542 children (0-7 years) who have died since January 2020 with a diagnosis of COVID (crude rate of 0.00007 per 100 and under 1 year old n=132, CDC data). This does not indicate whether, as John Hopkins’ Makary has been clamoring, the death was “causal or incidental.” That said, from January 2020, 1,043 children aged 0-17 have died of pneumonia. Briggs reports that “there is no good vaccine for pneumonia. But it could be avoided by keeping kids socially distanced from each other—permanently. If one death is “too many”, then you must not allow kids to be within contact of any human being who has a disease that may be passed to them, from which they may acquire pneumonia. They must also not be allowed in any car… [I]n one year, just about 3,091 kids 0-17 died in car crashes (435 from [ages] 0-4, 847 from [ages] 5-14, and 30% of 6,031 from [ages] 15-24). Multiply these 3,000 deaths in cars by about 1.75, since the Covid deaths are over a 21-month period. That makes about 5,250 kids dying in car crashes in the same period—10 times as many as Covid.” Yearly, 500 children in the US die of seasonal influenza and there has never been a vaccine mandate for it. Briggs concludes “there exists no justification based on any available evidence for mandatory vaccines for kids.”

4) Weisberg and Farber et al. suggest (building on research work by Kumar and Faber) that the reason children can more easily neutralize the virus is that their T cells are relatively naïve. They argue that since children’s T cells are mostly untrained, they can thus immunologically respond (optimally differentiate) more rapidly and nimbly to novel viruses such as SARS-CoV-2 for an effective robust response.

5) Recent research (August 2021) by Loske deepens our understanding of this natural type of biological/molecular protection even further by showing that pre-activated (primed) antiviral innate immunity in the upper airways of children work to control early SARS-CoV-2 infection: “Our study provides evidence that the airway immune cells in children are primed for virus sensing, resulting in a stronger early innate antiviral response to SARS-CoV-2 infection than in adults,” he writes.

6) When one is vaccinated or get infected naturally, this drives the formation, tissue distribution, and clonal evolution of B cells; this is key to encoding humoral immune memory. There is recent research evidence by Yang published in Science (May 2021) that blood examined from children retrieved prior to the COVID-19 pandemic has memory B cells that can bind to SARS-CoV-2, suggestive of the potent role of early childhood exposure to common cold coronaviruses (coronaviruses). This is supported by Mateus et al. who reported on T cell memory to prior coronaviruses that cause the common cold (cross-reactivity/cross-protection).

In closing, there is very little risk and no data, or evidence, or science to justify any of the COVID-19 injections in children. Can the content of these vaccines cross the blood-brain barrier in children? We do not know, for it was not studied. This is a reckless omission. In my opinion, based on the science and all the data collected across 19 months, under no circumstance should we expose the risk of the COVID injections to children. To consider subjecting healthy children to this risk to protect adults is perverse, reckless, and very dangerous. There is no proper safety data. The focus rather has to be on early treatment and testing (sero antibody or T-cell) to establish who, among those properly and ethically informed and able to consent, is a credible candidate for these injections, for it is also very dangerous to layer inoculation on top of the naturally acquired immunity of those who are COVID recovered (here, here, here). In this situation there are no benefits and only risks of adverse outcomes.

What does all of this mean? We could end up killing our children. Fauci, Walensky, Francis Collins, leave our children alone. CDC, FDA, NIH, leave our children alone! And take your liability protection off the table! You and the vaccine companies are protected from lawsuits. Take this protection off the table and share in a risk, too. You too must put up with a personal risk if you ask our children to do so. But I am really saying, “Leave our children alone. Do not touch them unless you are 100% sure that any drug or vaccine is safe. These have not been shown to be.” You, Fauci, know this. You, Walensky, know this. Stop misleading the nation and the parents! Moreover, these COVID vaccines are not needed based on the risk children bring. It is near zero! Consider them already vaccinated. Leave them alone!

Original Source: https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/children-are-naturally-immune-to-covid-and-should-not-take-the-jab/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Comments

04 Feb 23
The ureters should then be identified at the upper and lateral tumor floor before proceeding to divide the peritoneum on the posterior floor of the tumor. Able to commu are for unilateral involvement; when bilateral, nicate basic needs. Anxiety releases catecholamines, which improve myocardial workload and may escalate or delay ischemic ache medications 4 times a day buy discount topamax 100 mg. Douglas McGregor (1906-1964) summarized two potential views of management within the officeпїЅprinciple X and theory Y (figure 17). The applicator is positioned against the cervix (left) and pushed into the uterine cavity (middle) until its entrance finish reaches the fundus (right). Convulsion could also be followed by coma that lasts minutes or hours, depending on the frequency of seizures xifaxan antibiotic ibs 100 mg nitrofurantoin order with amex. A 24-year-old girl seems at 8 weeks of being pregnant and divulges a historical past of pulmonary embolism 7 years ago during her first being pregnant. Patient information and consent in trials for the treatment of benign prostatic obstruction. Evidence-based mostly suggestions for the clinical use of recombinant human erythropoietin women's health clinic andrews afb buy 20 mg nolvadex. For an agent to be labeled a teratogen, it should considerably improve the occurence of opposed structural or useful abnormalities in offspring after its administration to the female during being pregnant or directly to the creating organism. Maybe you could have misplaced your peace simply since you are worrying concerning the future and what might happen tomorrow. Toxicity with high daily doses (a hundred mg/kg) included prolonged estrous cycles, hyperplasia of the uterine endothelium, and a lower within the variety of growing ovarian follicles unifour pain treatment center anacin 525 mg buy without prescription. However, hypokalemia is refractory to correction within the presence of Mg deficiency, which additionally must be corrected when current; renal wasting of both cations could also be notably prominent after renal tubu lar injury. Spectrosomes are normally found in a rosette of cells just one or two cells deep from the apical hub. Hence, it has been instructed that the form by which dietary choline is consumed should beHence, it has been instructed that the shape during which dietary choline is consumed must be thought of about 1] medicine technology 30 mg remeron buy free shipping. Pyogenic osteomyelitis by Unlike bone, the cartilage lacks blood vessels, lymphatics haematogenous route occurs mostly in the long and nerves. It is essential in the perform of spreading tears and eradicating irritants from the floor of the cornea (entrance part of the eye) and the conjunctiva (the mucous membrane that covers the cornea and the liner of the eyelids). Freud thought that oedipal wishes are renounced on account of worry (castration worry) erectile dysfunction medication australia levitra with dapoxetine 20/60mg discount fast delivery. Additionally, systemic therapy was not used, and improved local management is more more likely to translate right into a survival benefit if effective systemic remedy is on the market. With this intoxication there clearly understood, genetic factors seem