Johns Hopkins Professor Marty Makary Explains Why He Won’t Debate Me

Johns Hopkins Professor Marty Makary Explains Why He Won’t Debate Me

Johns Hopkins Professor Marty Makary Explains Why He Won’t Debate Me

By Steve Kirsch

Dr. Martin Makary (Photo courtesy of Fiesta San Antonio Commission)
Professor Marty Makary won’t debate me because I might say something he doesn’t know the answer to. OK, got it.

I just got this note from one of my followers that explains why Marty Makary won’t debate me:

Good morning Mr Kirsch,

A friend of mine recently sent me a link to The ZDoggMD Show Spotify podcast that included a reference to you by Dr Marty Makary. While one part of the conversation mostly centered around the veracity of claims made by Dr Robert Malone, around the 2:19:15 mark, Makary mentioned you. He insisted that to debate you would be futile, because he can’t respond in real time to data you “throw out.”

He basically accuses you of performing a verbal data dump without allowing time to fact check. Makary gives an example that after taking several days to examine your Uttar Pradesh data, “you come to realize, wow, that’s total bullsit!”

Dr Zubin Damania, the podcast host, suggests that the only reasonable way to debate you would be to conduct it like a trial, with a discovery process. With both sides armed with data ahead of time, there would be no surprises. Makary concurs with host and claims, “you want debate, you want conversations, and stifling that is terrible.”

Mr Kirsch, this sounds to me like an attractive opening to finally debate someone in a very public setting. I propose you offer to provide Makary your data and arrange to debate him on The ZDoggMD Show. Having agreed to both Damania and Makary’s motion for discovery, how could they refuse? I suspect the episode would be at least as popular as Rogan’s Malone interview—and it won’t cost you $1 million.

Wow. Marty is basically saying he won’t debate me because he’s afraid I’ll pull out a fact he is not prepared to answer and that’s unfair.

Let’s be clear. My data is out there. In public view. Since May 2021. Thousands of pages of stuff.

I’m happy to limit the debate topics to anything I’ve already published on my Substack and on TrialSiteNews. It’s all there in plain sight.

Marty can cherry pick anything they want to challenge and research it for a month. That puts me at a significant disadvantage because I won’t know which ones in advance they want to target.

Marty can even propose his rules for what he considers a fair debate so we can discuss the most important issues such as listed in Incriminating Evidence or my 100 questions posts.

His mission should be to discredit me on my position to show the world I’m wrong and that the vaccines are perfectly safe. That should be easy for an expert such as himself. I’m just a dumb engineer who never went to medical school. How can he be afraid of me?

I’m agreeable to using ONLY things I’ve written about. Marty has therefore nothing to fear. No surprises.

I emailed Marty a link to this article, but I don’t expect to hear back from him because he never answers any of my emails. Neither does Zubin.

If he answers, I’ll post his response. My advice: don’t hold your breath on that happening.

If Marty cared about correcting misinformation, he’d tell you (and me) what the cause of the low case and death count in Uttar Pradesh was. Did he do that? Of course not! He told us nothing. He left us in the dark. He spent several days to do the research, then he concealed the truth from the public. This is how a real medical scientists is supposed to act: do the research and then don’t tell anyone.

Let’s be clear: these guys don’t want a debate because they don’t want to be exposed publicly. The data isn’t on their side and they know they can’t defend it, even from someone with no formal medical training.

That’s just stunning to me.


This comment sums it up quite nicely:

Dr. Jeffrey Wheeler

If you have a command of the facts, integrity, intellectual honesty, and are committed to pursuit of the truth there should be no hesitation for a comprehensive debate no matter the terms. After all, is the truth not the goal?

So does this comment:

Interesting and very sad that in their minds it’s all about their comfort and their looking good in front of the camera instead of a humane & medically professional point of view = “Let’s find out the Truth, so we can save more people’s lives and give them the medical help they need to either remain healthy or to heal them.”

This comment is worth reading as well.

In other words, they are trying to make excuses for why they won’t debate.

Original Source:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Comments

03 Oct 22
Cross References Ataxia; Functional weak point and sensory disturbance; Proprioception; Tandem walking Roos Test Roos test, or the elevated arm stress test, could also be useful within the prognosis of vascular thoracic outlet syndrome, together with Adson�s take a look at. Maintain glucose >90: normally achieved with a glucose infusion fee of 8–10 mg/kg/min. Instruct sufferers on warfarin therapy to not take some other drugs unless permitted by their doctor treatment tinnitus trazodone 100 mg free shipping. Do not judge sufferers by their life-style, age or might assume that everything they learn on the Internet is socioeconomic standing. Pigment changes, particularly of the lower limbs, give the condition often known as �leopard skin� while lack of pores and skin elasticity and lymphadenitis might end in �hanging groin�. Investigationthe medical index of suspicion of renovascular hypertension is split into three classes (Box 3) heart attack 6 days collections order tenormin 100mg without prescription. The 30-kb scale bar is positioned to show the area concerned within the tandem duplication. This is why estrogen diminution leads to the enabling of prolactin to induce its physiological effects. The goals of the sampling programmes to be mutually agreed ought to recognise the requirements to establish the degree of certainty necessary to attain these objectives antibiotic 825 buy 250mg medimacrol with visa. We have no idea whether this supposition, grounded in long-standing psycho- logical beliefs, was true. Streptokinase is eliminated rapidly from the circulation by antibodies and the reticuloendothelial system (a physique system involved in defending against infection and disposing of merchandise of cell breakdown). Donna Pfirman Donna Biagini Anne Hamilton Linda Plybon Jenise Brassell Denise Hill Faye Rice Karen Brewer Suzanne Hogan Cindy Riddle Carol Burnett Hongwei Hsiao, Ph pain treatment lung cancer order imdur 40mg without prescription. Guidelines of take care of the person agement of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: Section 1. Part three People buyer and employees care If we arent pleasing our clients then the remainder is totally irrelevant. Note the intimate relationship of these cell groups and pathways with the ascending arousal system herbs like weed buy discount npxl on-line. The finish of the needle or catheter is gently intro 112 removed 1 2 hours later by the patient. M/E Light microscopy shows the next fndings: i) Glomeruli the characteristic fnding is diffuse thickening of the glomerular capillary walls with all the glomeruli being affected more or less uniformly. The Company doesn't anticipate restructuring expense and collaborative reimbursement income to be materials gastritis duodenitis diet ranitidine 300mg online. Br J Urol 1998;one hundred sixty(5):1680�the Long-Term Effect of Doxazosin, Finasteride, and 1684. Globulin calculated: total protein - albumin Levetiracetam Serum Target range: 12-forty six 5 working Referred to (brown), mg/L days exterior lab 1 mL Lithium Serum zero. These provisions have profound significance for the triangular relationship between the kid, the household and the state spasms in chest order colospa online. A two-era dietary replica studied was carried out in male and female rats with oral doses of 3–one hundred mg/kg/day from